Since this post was written, Autharium has modified and improved its Terms and Conditions. Please see the addendum at the bottom of this post.
Over the past few weeks I’ve gotten a number of questions and alerts about author-unfriendly Terms and Conditions at Autharium, a new epublishing startup. So I thought I’d check into it myself.
Autharium describes itself thus:
Autharium was created with the purpose of discovering great writers and publishing their work. The idea struck the co-founders Matt Bradbeer, Simon Maylott and Aaron Bell when they discovered and became frustrated with how difficult or expensive it was to publish a book, break through the old publishing routes and reach readers…
There is no charge to be published and distributed through Autharium, there are no hidden costs and the royalties are always split in the authors [sic] favour. Our mission is to discover and publish the next great books and the authors behind them.
Authors can use Autharium’s online tools to upload, format, and edit their books (which sure sounds like self-publishing, although, according to Autharium’s FAQ, books are “curated” and not everything that’s submitted is published). Once books are uploaded, authors can can send them to the Autharium community for comment and review, or submit them for publication. Payment is 85% of net revenue.
Autharium is in beta, and currently free to use. However (and despite the language quoted above), wording on the site and in the Terms and Conditions strongly suggests that there will be publishing and other fees at some point in the future.
So far, Autharium sounds like one of those combination writing communities/self-publishing services, a la Book Country, YouWriteOn, or the recently-defunct WeBook. As long as there’s a decent community sharing feedback, and the publishing service is free or low-cost, where’s the problem?
As is so often the case, in the publishing agreement.
Trouble appears in the very first clause of Autharium’s Publishing Terms and Conditions for Authors (I’ve bolded the significant language):
1.1 By submitting your Work to Autharium and accepting these Terms & Conditions, you grant to Autharium the exclusive right and licence to produce, publish, promote, market and sell your Work in any Digital Form…in all languages throughout the world for the entire legal term of copyright (and any and all extensions, renewals and revivals of the term of copyright).
1.2 You agree that Autharium shall also be entitled to license retailers, distributors, agents, licensees, sub-contractors and other third parties to exercise the rights you have granted to Autharium under this Agreement.
1.3 The rights granted in paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above shall also apply to any adaptation or any abridgement of your Work or any substantial part of your Work.
In other words, by submitting your manuscript to Autharium for publication, you are granting exclusive digital publishing rights to your work, and to adaptations/abridgements of your work, in all languages, for the entire duration of copyright, as well as the ability to license those rights to others. That’s a pretty sweeping grant of rights–not what you typically expect to find in the contract of a self-publishing service.
If Autharium decides not to publish your manuscript, it will notify you, and the grant will terminate immediately. But until you receive such notification you are bound to Autharium, and cannot publish your work anywhere else in digital form. Since there’s nothing in the contract that requires Autharium to be prompt, or gives it a timeframe in which to respond, you could be waiting for a while.
It gets worse. Authors who publish with Autharium can remove their work from sale at any time–but this “will not terminate this Agreement nor cause the exclusive digital publishing rights that you have granted to Autharium…to revert to you.” So you can terminate your book–but Autharium will still hold the rights and you won’t be able to publish elsewhere unless you can get Autharium to give you permission. (Enquiring minds can’t help wondering whether, in such a case, a fee might be involved.)
In fact, per Autharium’s Term, Termination, Reversion and Suspension of Rights clause, authors have no termination rights whatever unless Autharium breaches the terms of the Agreement and fails to remedy the breach, or allows a work to become “unavailable in all editions” (and “available” might just mean an ebook for sale on Autharium’s own website).
There is so much wrong here.
– A life-of-copyright grant term. I’ve said elsewhere that life-of-copyright grant terms are not a problem as long as there’s precise reversion language that ensures that authors can get their rights back once sales fall below stated minimums. However, that’s in reference to publishers–not glorified self-publishing services like Autharium. Life-of-copyright terms are completely inappropriate for such services (this is one of the things that made the agreement for Dymocks’ recently-terminated D Publishing service so horrific). Even a fixed-term contract isn’t desirable when you’re self-publishing.
– An exclusive grant term. Exclusivity is also not desirable when you’re self-publishing, unless the publishing service is offering something major in return (such as payment for ebook lending, as with Amazon’s Kindle Owners’ Lending Library). You want to be able to maximize sales and readership by publishing to as many platforms as possible; exclusivity prevents you from doing that.
– A claim on rights beyond ebooks. Autharium publishes “in Digital Form,” which is sweepingly defined as “any and all electronic and/or digital forms and media whether now known or later invented or developed.” This conceivably could include not just ebooks but audiobooks, enhanced ebooks, and video games. Additionally, Autharium claims the right to publish in all languages, and to license your rights to others. All of this negates one of the main benefits of self-publishing: minimal encumbrance of your rights. A self-publishing service should not require you to grant rights beyond those necessary to provide the service.
– Authors cannot terminate at will. Another of the major benefits of self-publishing is control. If you lose the right to terminate an agreement at any time, for any reason, you’re giving up a huge amount of control–especially if the terms of the agreement don’t allow you to publish anywhere else.
– Inadequate definition of out-of-print. See life-of-copyright, above. If you can’t terminate at will, there should at least be clear, objective reversion terms that allow you to regain your rights after a fixed period of time or once sales fall below stated minimums. Otherwise, the publishing service can hang onto your rights for as long as it chooses, whether or not your book is selling. Autharium’s vague out-of-print language, the effect of which is to enable it to keep a death-grip on your rights as long as a single electronic edition of your book is available on a single website somewhere, is completely inadequate.
– Will eager authors discover these unfavorable terms? I signed up for Autharium and uploaded a document. I got as far as the Publishing Options page, where, before they can submit for publication, authors are required to check a box to accept Autharium’s Terms and Conditions. Not only is it not stated that these are the publishing terms and conditions (there are also general terms and conditions), the link provided goes nowhere. Often enough, authors barely skim Terms and Conditions or publishing agreements, even when they’re easy to find. Making authors work to find them is practically a guarantee they won’t be read.
In response to criticism elsewhere, Autharium staff have argued that Autharium is a publisher, not a self-publishing service, because “we do not publish everything submitted.” However, publishers don’t leave formatting, editing, and cover art to authors, or allow authors to set book prices. Those are hallmarks of self-publishing services. And even if we cut Autharium a hundred miles of slack and agree it’s a publisher, its reversion language still sucks.
All in all, a bad deal for authors.
UPDATE 11/1/13: Autharium’s Publishing Terms and Conditions have been changed.
– The Publishing Terms and Conditions now make clear–and the Autharium website has been re-vamped to ensure–that merely submitting work for feedback by the Autharium community does not subject that work to a grant of publication.
– By submitting for publication, you are still granting Autharium an exclusive license to your work in digital form, as well as adaptations and abridgements of your work, which Autharium can in turn license to various third parties. But instead of the legal term of copyright, the grant term has been shortened to five years. This is renewable automatically (and apparently indefinitely), but after the initial five years you can email Autharium at any time with a termination request, and your rights will be reverted. You can also revert rights three years after publication if your book has sold fewer than 20 copies in its third publication year or in any year following.
– You can petition at any time to remove your work from sale (though this doesn’t terminate the agreement).
–The definition of “Digital Book Form” has been limited as follows: “For avoidance of doubt this does not include physical or audio book forms, videos, film, television, merchandise or game forms.”
– Autharium is still free (apart from the 15% cut Autharium takes of sales revenue).
I’m still concerned that the exclusive nature of the publication agreement, as well as its claim on “adaptations and abridgements”, isn’t ideal for a self-publishing service (and I would still define Autharium as a self-publishing service, despite its provision of an editorial review). Overall, though, the terms it offers are greatly improved.
UPDATE 6/27/15: Autharium is now Indie, with a different web domain and URL (the Autharium URL yields a 404 notice). The business model appears to be the same.
Autharium tried a takedown request to me as well, so it doesn't surprise me to learn that they've threatened others.
It also looks as if they're continuing to modify their Publishing Terms and Conditions. When I added an addendum to this post last November, the grant term was five years. Now it's three.
I'm guessing that the clause you're referring to is 13.8 (here's a link to Autharium's Terms and Conditions, for those who are following along). PG says,
However, PG will say that Paragraph 13.8 appears to materially modify the three-year termination provision described in Paragraph 1.1 by granting the author the right to terminate the contract after three years only if the book has sold less than 20 copies in a contract year.
I'm wondering if Autharium has modified their T&C yet again, because unless I'm missing something, the clause as currently written doesn't appear to restrict authors' right to terminate after 3 years. In fact, it appears to give authors the right to request reversion even sooner. "However, If less than 20 copies of your book have been sold within the first full year of publication you can request your rights be reverted at anytime by giving 30 days notice to email@example.com."
It looks as if they're taking critics' advice, while also trying to quash discussion of their services. Not cool.
Autharium continues to make friends by sending Google a DMCA takedown notice for quoting their terms over at the Passive Voice blog.
It points out that, while a number of the more egregious clauses were removed, there's a tricky one buried deep in the contract that may prove troublesome. I would quote it, but I'd hate for your site to get into trouble with Autharium. Best to save trouble all round by avoiding them.
(See, this is what suppressing discussion can do for your public image.)
For an update on Autharium's author-unfriendly terms, see The Passive Voice at http://www.thepassivevoice.com/02/2014/autharium-the-cover-up/
Hi I am published with Autharium, and at the time I submitted I will admit I did kind of see them as a self-publishing platform – this was fine, and things went well until a small publisher i had previously submitted to got back to me wanting to publish one of my books. i then realised I would need Authariums permission to do this. To give them due credit they were happy to do so. They have totally removed this book from their site, and as of next year it will be released through the new publisher. They did not have to do this, but there interest is in helping new writers, not scamming them. i did not have to pay a penny to get the rights reversed. It was all very amicable. I will continue to place books with them, and they are evolving like all new enterprises, and are very keen to listen to feedback and make changes. Just thought I would share!
Autharium's terms have indeed been changed (though I have no idea when). I've updated my post to reflect this.
Just looked, it seems as though the terms were changed way back in March. They are a startup and impressive for being so responsive and open to the feedback. Got my vote!
Thank you for this. It is so very easy to be caught out.
New authors tend to be so desperate to be published that they are not nearly critical enough,
It is their terms, I just checked. Outrageous IMHO.
@Marquita That's correct, not their terms. I emailed their founder and had a follow-up chat with him on Skype.
Apparently when this article was released, Autharium addressed the concerns and posted their updated terms shortly after, but was unable to get a response from Writer Beware concerning the updates.
Considering that they were in a small beta at the time of this article, amiably revised their terms accordingly, and that none of their 1500 published authors have voiced complaint, I'd say they are not quite as author-unfriendly as this suggests.
Writer Beware is an excellent service to the writing community, but looking into articles like this one gives me pause; it seems that a slightly more responsive feedback loop and a little less guilty until proven innocent would go a long way to protecting legitimate small publishers.
Autharium's platform is better than blurb, lulu and createspace.
Here's an interesting update. I tweeted your article and heard back from Autharium saying that this is n-o-t their Terms and Conditions – which is funny because before tweeting I actually looked at their T/C to confirm. Hum. Anyway, here's the link to what they say is the "correct" Terms and Conditions … http://www.autharium.com/Page/author-publishing-terms-and-conditions
I looked at Autharium a few months back and thankfully read the T&Cs – it was the points you high-lighted that made me stop mid-process and not publish with them.
A life-of-copyright grant? No automatic reversion of rights if the author wishes to terminate the contract? No thanks.
Glad you've brought this to a wider attention. I'm embarrassed that it's based in the UK.
"I've said elsewhere that life-of-copyright grant terms are not a problem as long as there's precise reversion language"
And I've always had a serious problem with this, despite its being commonplace. The author begins from the unnecessarily weakened position of giving away too much, without, IMO, justification – and then attempts to try and set things right in the details. Better would be to grant tiered rights / license. The better the publisher does, the more / longer rights they get to exercise – and the author is much better protected.
As always, four little words can save a whole lot of heartache … read. The. Fine. Print!
Thanks so much for this post! I also checked into Autharium, and was completely put off by their Terms and Conditions (which I ALWAYS make a point to read thoroughly) – I've shared this on my facebook page and tweeted it – a must read for all writers! ~ Julie