Latest Posts

Two New Solicitation Bewares: DiscoverPublishers.com and Reseller Ventures

Header image: "No Soliciting Please" sign hanging on a red-brick wall (Credit: rSnapshotPhotos / Shutterstock.com)

I've gotten several reports over the past few days about solicitations from an outfit called DiscoverPublishers.com. The solicitations are "personalized" with the author's name, and have slightly different text, but the import is the same.

In the original email, if you hover over the link you'll see that it actually goes to a different URL, https://goto.discoverpublishers.com/grow/. That's often the case with mass marketing campaigns, which take you to a special page that tracks clicks from the solicitation emails.

So what is DiscoverPublishers.com? (That's the real URL.) On visiting, I recognized it as a company I mentioned all the way back in 2018, as part of a post on predatory publisher-finding and -matching "services". These outfits have you fill out a form with your name, contact information, and maybe a couple of things about your manuscript (is it fiction? What's your budget?) and then either provide you with a list of supposedly perfect matches, or promise to send your matches to you.

Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: SFWA’s Comments to the US Copyright Office

Image Header: Neon image of a human brain embedded in a computer motherboard. Credit: vchal at Shutterstock.com https://www.shutterstock.com/

In August, the US Copyright Office issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking public comment on copyright and artificial intelligence. The NOI is part of the Copyright Office's AI Initiative, which seeks to assess whether copyright-related legislation or regulation is needed in response to the rapid development and deployment of generative AI.

The NOI seeks factual information and views on a number of copyright issues raised by recent advances in generative AI. These issues include the use of copyrighted works to train AI models, the appropriate levels of transparency and disclosure with respect to the use of copyrighted works, the legal status of AI-generated outputs, and the appropriate treatment of AI-generated outputs that mimic personal attributes of human artists.

Below is the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association's response to the NOI. It details a variety of harms reported by novelists and short fiction writers as a result of generative AI (including the training of AI systems on vast amounts of in-copyright work without permission), and offers four specific suggestions for protecting creators and their work.

Contest Caution: Lichfield Institute Writing Contest

Lichfield Institute writing contest: $10,000 first prize, $5,000 second prize, $1,050 third prize. Promises "important literary feedback from our distinguished judges" for each submission, and monthly stipends and "considered for representation by literary agencies" for honorable mentions

I've gotten several questions lately about a writing contest offering enormous prizes: the Lichfield Institute Writing Contest (screenshot above).

Just about every temptation for a hungry writer is here. Big bucks for the winners. Feedback on every submission from distinguished judges--at least, one assumes they're distinguished, since they're finalists for important literary awards. Monthly stipends! Consideration by literary agencies! What more could a contest offer, even if it does charge a $15 submission fee?

Well...

Imposter Syndrome: The Rise of Impersonation Scams

Header image: joke mask with glasses, fuzzy eyebrows, and a fake nose on a white background (credit: Marco Verch Professional Photographer / Flickr.com)

I'm blogging over at Writer Unboxed again today, with an overview of a type of scam that currently represents 50% or more of the questions and complaints I receive.

The current self-publishing industry has its roots in the mid-1990s, when three startups–Xlibris, Trafford, and AuthorHouse–began selling digital publishing services to individual authors.

(Bear with me: I’m getting to the subject of this post!)

Why Writer Beware Doesn’t Recommend or Endorse Agents or Publishers

Header image: computer keyboard with a green "thumbs up" button and a red "thumbs down" button (credit: Tatiana Popova / Shutterstock.com)

"You warn about so many bad literary agents and publishers, why don't you ever tell us about the good ones?"

It's a question Writer Beware has been getting for almost as long as we've been around, from writers bewildered about where to go for reliable information, frustrated by the abundance of author-focused schemes and scams, or just exhausted by the work of finding a good home for their manuscripts.

I have a standard answer that I provide when people email me with this question or ask me on social media. But with writing scams more prevalent than ever, and writers more beleaguered by fraudulent solicitations than at any time in Writer Beware's history, I thought it would be helpful to offer a more detailed explanation of why we call out the bad guys but don't focus on the good guys.

Vanity Radio and TV: Think Twice Before Paying for Interviews

Header image: a microphone resting on a carpet of $100 bills (credit: ZhdanHenn / Shutterstock.com)

In a super-crowded, hyper-competitive marketplace, one of the main challenges for book authors is to stand out. And where there's a need, there are always unscrupulous operators waiting to take advantage. The internet is awash in worthless schemes and outright scams designed to profit from authors' hunger for publicity and exposure.

I've written about a number of these junk marketing products: Hollywood book-to-screen packages, the hugely marked-up PR options offered by assisted self-publishing conglomerate Author Solutions, high entry fee awards programs, offers for book fair "representation", advertising in pay-to-play magazines, faux news segments, expensive paid shelf space schemes.

Today, I'm going to talk about vanity radio and TV interviews.